38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, May 19, 2024
Judiciary

Welfare Of Child Is Of Paramount Importance Says Bombay High Court While Denying Custody Of 3-Year-Old Child To Father With “Anger Issues”[Read Judgment]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      07 December, 2023 06:28 PM      0 Comments
Welfare Of Child Is Of Paramount Importance Says Bombay High Court While Denying Custody Of 3 Year Old Child To Father With Anger Issues

In considering the “best interest” and “safety” of a child, the Bombay High Court dismissed a habeas corpus writ petition filed by a 41-year-old UK citizen who was seeking the custody of his 3-year-old daughter. 


A Bench of Justices Gauri Godse and Revathi Mohite Dere noted that the man had severe “anger issues” and that it would be the best interest of child if she stayed with her mother.


“In addition to the reasons recorded above, one more important factor to be considered is that the child is a girl of a tender age of three and half years and thus requires the care and affection of her mother. Considering the past conduct of the petitioner having anger issues, it will not be safe to hand over custody of the child to him. We have held that the respondent is justified in her decision to come to India and not return to Singapore.”


In this case, the petitioner-father of the child is a UK citizen, the respondent mother of the child is an Indian citizen, and the child-their minor daughter is a US citizen. 


The estranged couple had married in New York in 2018, and after their child was born in March 2020, the couple lived apart for six months owing to marital disagreements. They later signed a reconciliation agreement and relocated to Singapore. The pair renounced their 'green card' in the United States in September of last year, and after two months, the lady moved to India with her kid and did not return to Singapore.


Amid this, the man (the petitioner) then filed a plea in a Singapore court, which ordered joint custody of the child. In February this year, he approached the Bombay High Court seeking compliance of the Singapore court’s order as well as sought the custody of the child.


After relying on several precedents, the Court stated that doctrines of comity of courts, intimate connect, orders passed by foreign courts in the matter regarding custody of the minor child, forum convenience, citizenship of the parents and the child, etc., cannot override the consideration of the best interest and the welfare of the child.


“Thus, the direction to return the child to a foreign jurisdiction must not result in any physical, mental, psychological, or other harm to the child. It is a well-settled principle of law that the courts should decide the issue of custody only based on what is in the best interest of the child.”


The Court further noted that owing to the differences and disputes between the parties, the child never received any stability at any place. “The child is neither a citizen of Singapore nor has she lived there for a considerable long time to make it a habitual place of residence”, the Court said. 


Light was also thrown on various affidavits filed by the Respondent mother which revealed the petitioner father’s anger issues and violent nature. Therefore, the Court failed to agree with the father’s argument that the mother had illegally detained the child in India. 


“Thus, in our view the aforesaid circumstances and the petitioner's conduct are justifiable reasons for the respondent to come to India along with the child to reside with her parents. We find substance in the arguments made on behalf of the respondent that she was required to come to India along with the child for their safety. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, we do not find that the respondent has illegally removed the child from Singapore or that she has illegally detained the child in India. Thus, considering the petitioner's conduct, the respondent is justified in bringing the child to India to give her a secure life.”


The Bench also noted that the petitioner agreed to not getting unsupervised access to the child until the respondent consented to the same. Even after the reconciliation agreement, there was a police complaint made by the Respondent mother in the USA and thereafter in Singapore, and finally, the respondent came to India along with the child and refused to return to Singapore. 


Since the child is a US citizen, and Singapore and India are both foreign countries to her, the Court noted. However, the Respondent mother is an Indian citizen having roots in India. “Thus, it cannot be said that the child is living in a country which is completely foreign to her”. 


“However, only the welfare of the child is of paramount importance, and thus, in view of our observations and findings recorded above, presently, it will be in the best interest of the child to stay in India with her mother, i.e. the respondent”. 


While parting with the 59-page order, the Court highlighted the child’s right to have the company of both parents. “It is true that the conduct of either of the parties should not deprive the child of having the company of both parents. In the battle of the parents, the child should not suffer”, the Court said while dismissing the father’s plea. It also added that the issue regarding visitation rights will be considered by a competent court.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Kedarnath Movie: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL To Stay Release Kedarnath Movie: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL To Stay Release

The Bombay High Court on December 6, 2018, dismissed a petition filed against upcoming movie Kedarnath seeking a direction to stay the release of the movie

Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband [Read Order] Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband [Read Order]

Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband || "It is open for the court to decide the application filed by the husband under Section 25 of the 1955 Act, seeking monthly maintenance, by way of final proceedings, pending which, the application for interim maintenance filed under Section 24 of the Act of 1955, has been rightly entertained by the learned Judge and the husband has been held entitled to interim maintenance while the proceedings under Section 25 are pending," she noted.

Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief

Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief || "There is something or the other going against every leader of the NCP, Congress and Shiv Sena... Prime Minister Narendra Modi has one thing in mind: he wants BJP rule from Kashmir to Kanyakumari, irrespective of the wishes of the people," Pawar said.

Salman Khan Approaches Bombay High Court Challenging Summons By  Lower Court Against Complaint of a Journalist Salman Khan Approaches Bombay High Court Challenging Summons By Lower Court Against Complaint of a Journalist

The magistrate court issues the process if it finds prima facie substance in the allegations made in the complaint. Once the process is issued, the accused persons have to appear before the court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-notice-to-ec-on-plea-by-adr-for-release-of-voters-turnout-data
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to EC on plea by ADR for release of voters turnout data

SC issues notice to EC on ADR plea to release voter turnout data. SC demands EC to disclose vote counts within 48 hours after each phase of the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.

18 May, 2024 11:16 AM
delhi-hc-refuses-jackie-shroff-interim-relief-against-youtuber-unfilteredthugesh-for-alleged-personality-rights-infringement
Trending CelebStreet
Delhi HC refuses Jackie Shroff interim relief against Youtuber 'UnfilteredThugesh' for using "Thug Life" in video on Shroff

The Delhi High Court has refused Jackie Shroff interim relief against Youtuber 'UnfilteredThugesh' for alleged personality rights' infringement.

18 May, 2024 05:20 PM

TOP STORIES

indian-courts-this-week-law-street-journals-weekly-round-up-of-sc-hcs-may-6-may-10
Trending Judiciary
Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [May 6 - May 10]

Get the latest updates from India's Supreme Court and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

13 May, 2024 10:29 AM
sc-dismisses-union-govt-plea-against-bail-to-maoist-financer-in-case-of-attack-on-police-party-in-jharkhand
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Union govt's plea against bail to Maoist financer in case of attack on police party in Jharkhand [Read Judgment]

SC rejects govt's plea against bail for accused in Jharkhand police attack case, citing absence of violated bail conditions.

13 May, 2024 11:33 AM
supreme-court-upholds-gang-rape-conviction-though-victim-turned-hostile
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court upholds gang rape conviction, though victim turned hostile [Read Judgment]

SC upholds gang rape conviction despite victim's hostility, affirming witness credibility in criminal trials.

13 May, 2024 12:24 PM
sanatana-dharma-remarks-sc-seeks-response-from-up-maha-ktka-bihar-jamp;k-on-udhayanidhis-plea-for-clubbing-firs
Trending Judiciary
Sanatana Dharma remarks SC seeks response from UP, Maha, Ktka, Bihar, J&K on Udhayanidhi's plea for clubbing FIRs

SC seeks response on Udhayanidhi's plea for clubbing FIRs related to his remarks on 'Sanatan Dharma'.

13 May, 2024 12:39 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email