38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, May 19, 2024
Judiciary

Supreme Court sends reminder to Allahabad High Court to provide details of suits regarding the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah Mosque

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      03 October, 2023 07:03 PM      0 Comments
SC sends reminder to Alld HC to provide details of suits regarding the Krishna Janmabhoomi Shahi Eidgah Mosque

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday once again asked the Allahabad High Court to provide details of the suits regarding the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah Mosque dispute being heard by it.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia pointed out no information or document has been received from the registry of the Allahabad High Court, despite its earlier order on July 21.

The court ordered the registrar concerned to be personally present before it on the next date.

The court fixed the matter for consideration on October 30, while  directing its registry to send a reminder with its last order to the high court's registry.

"This order be placed before Chief Justice, Allahabad High Court on administrative side so that we have a proper response. Concerned Registrar of High Court to remain personally present in court," the bench ordered.

A counsel appearing for mosque committee claimed that the recent spate of litigation was initiated by outsiders even though Hindus and Muslims have lived in harmony for the last five decades in the region. She also contended that it was difficult for her client to travel to Allahabad High Court, which was about 600 km away from Mathura for pursuing the litigation.

On this, the bench said that the problem is due to the benches at Lucknow and Allahabad only.

The bench, however, assured the counsel to look into the grievances after getting details of the cases transferred by the High Court to itself.

On July 21, the top court sought details of the pending suits related to Krishna Janmabhoomi at Mathura transferred by the Allahabad High Court to itself for adjudication, saying multiplicity of proceedings and delay were not in the interest of anybody.

The court had asked the Muslim side, which challenged the validity of the High Court's May 26 order, if it is not in the interest of everybody that the suits are consolidated and tried at the higher level at the earliest.

The bench said pendency of matter causes its own disquiet as multiple suits have been filed in the matter.

"It is in the larger interest of everybody that the matter is decided at a higher level," the bench orally said.

The counsel from the Muslim side contended the suits were filed only from 2020, while the transfer petition was filed in the HC with regard to one suit which challenged a compromise decree of 1968.

The counsel had also submitted that the transfer of suits would deprive the parties of an appellate jurisdiction and all the parties do not have wherewithal to travel to the High Court.

The bench again said it would be better if the issue is settled at higher level.

By its May 26, 2023 decision, the Allahabad High Court ordered for transfer of all the cases related to Krishna Janmabhoomi pending before the Mathura court to itself.

A single bench of Justice Arvind Kumar Mishra had then allowed a transfer petition filed by Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman and seven others.

While allowing the plea for transfer of one suit, the court had then exercised its suo motu power for the rest of the suits of similar nature, by withdrawing it from the lower civil court concerned and transferred those to the High Court.

The matter arose out of a plea originally filed in the court of civil judge senior division on September 25, 2020 by Lucknow-resident Ranjana Agnihotri, and others as the "next friend of Bhagwan Sri Krishna Virajman".

They had claimed in the plea that Shahi Idgah Masjid is constructed on a part of 13.37 acre land belonging to the Sri Krishna Janam Bhoomi Trust. They had demanded the mosque be removed and the land returned to the Trust.

They also contended that the Shahi Idgah Mosque had been built by Mughal emperor Aurangzeb after demolishing a part of the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi.

They have also challenged the 1968 agreement between the Shahi Idgah Mosque Committee and the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust allowing the Mosque to continue to exist and use the land on which it was situated.

They also made claim over the entire birth place of Lord Krishna and sought removal of alleged encroachment of superstructure built as Shahi Idgah masjid over there.

Notably, suits related to Ram Janmabhoomi at Ayodhya was also transferred for trial before the High Court on July 10, 1989, which was decided on September 30, 2010. Subsequently, the Supreme Court's five-judge bench on November 9, 2019 ruled in favour of Hindu side.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Allahabad High Court Transfers Krishna Janmabhoomi Cases to Itself for Trial [Transfer Application] Allahabad High Court Transfers Krishna Janmabhoomi Cases to Itself for Trial [Transfer Application]

The Allahabad High Court has ordered the transfer of all cases related to Krishna Janmabhoomi from the Mathura court to itself. The court exercised its suo motu power for trial and allowed a transfer petition filed by Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman and others. The cases involve the claim that Shahi Idgah Masjid was constructed on land belonging to the Sri Krishna Janam Bhoomi Trust and demand its removal. The court directed the District Judge, Mathura to prepare a list of similar cases for transfer. The decision raises complex questions related to the interpretation of laws and the rights of Hindu deities and devotees.

Allahabad High Court Raps Censor Board Over Dialogues and Scenes in 'Adipurush Allahabad High Court Raps Censor Board Over Dialogues and Scenes in 'Adipurush

The Allahabad High Court criticizes the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for approving the film 'Adipurush' despite objectionable dialogues and scenes from the Hindu epic 'Ramayana'. The court questions the board's understanding of its responsibilities and considers banning the movie. Social activists have filed PILs, claiming that the film has hurt religious sentiments. The court also allows a co-writer to be a party in the matter. This is not the first time such controversy has arisen in Bollywood films.

Supreme Court: No Lesser Sentence Under POCSO Act for Aggravated Sexual Assault on Children [Read Judgment] Supreme Court: No Lesser Sentence Under POCSO Act for Aggravated Sexual Assault on Children [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that courts cannot impose a lesser sentence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The decision came in response to a case where the Allahabad High Court reduced the sentence of a man convicted of aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child. The Supreme Court emphasized the lifelong impact on the victim and upheld the importance of stringent punishment for such crimes.

'Adipurush' Makers File Plea in Supreme Court Against High Court Order on Personal Appearance 'Adipurush' Makers File Plea in Supreme Court Against High Court Order on Personal Appearance

The makers of 'Adipurush' have filed a plea in the Supreme Court against the High Court's order on their personal appearance regarding objectionable content. Two PILs were filed alleging the movie's depiction of religious gods and characters, hurting public sentiments.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-notice-to-ec-on-plea-by-adr-for-release-of-voters-turnout-data
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to EC on plea by ADR for release of voters turnout data

SC issues notice to EC on ADR plea to release voter turnout data. SC demands EC to disclose vote counts within 48 hours after each phase of the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.

18 May, 2024 11:16 AM
delhi-hc-refuses-jackie-shroff-interim-relief-against-youtuber-unfilteredthugesh-for-alleged-personality-rights-infringement
Trending CelebStreet
Delhi HC refuses Jackie Shroff interim relief against Youtuber 'UnfilteredThugesh' for using "Thug Life" in video on Shroff

The Delhi High Court has refused Jackie Shroff interim relief against Youtuber 'UnfilteredThugesh' for alleged personality rights' infringement.

18 May, 2024 05:20 PM

TOP STORIES

indian-courts-this-week-law-street-journals-weekly-round-up-of-sc-hcs-may-6-may-10
Trending Judiciary
Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [May 6 - May 10]

Get the latest updates from India's Supreme Court and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

13 May, 2024 10:29 AM
sc-dismisses-union-govt-plea-against-bail-to-maoist-financer-in-case-of-attack-on-police-party-in-jharkhand
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Union govt's plea against bail to Maoist financer in case of attack on police party in Jharkhand [Read Judgment]

SC rejects govt's plea against bail for accused in Jharkhand police attack case, citing absence of violated bail conditions.

13 May, 2024 11:33 AM
supreme-court-upholds-gang-rape-conviction-though-victim-turned-hostile
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court upholds gang rape conviction, though victim turned hostile [Read Judgment]

SC upholds gang rape conviction despite victim's hostility, affirming witness credibility in criminal trials.

13 May, 2024 12:24 PM
sanatana-dharma-remarks-sc-seeks-response-from-up-maha-ktka-bihar-jamp;k-on-udhayanidhis-plea-for-clubbing-firs
Trending Judiciary
Sanatana Dharma remarks SC seeks response from UP, Maha, Ktka, Bihar, J&K on Udhayanidhi's plea for clubbing FIRs

SC seeks response on Udhayanidhi's plea for clubbing FIRs related to his remarks on 'Sanatan Dharma'.

13 May, 2024 12:39 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email