38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, May 18, 2024
Judiciary

SC quashes FIR against woman for fabricating husband's signature on son's passport; imposes Rs one lakh cost on husband [Read Judgment]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      23 January, 2024 04:54 PM      0 Comments
SC quashes FIR against woman for fabricating husband's signature on son's passport; imposes Rs one lakh cost on husband [Read Judgment]

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings against a woman and her father initiated on an FIR by her husband after a martial dispute for allegedly fabricating his signature to obtain passport for their minor son.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant Dipankar Datta said every deceitful act is not unlawful, just as not every unlawful act is deceitful and some acts may be termed both as unlawful as well as deceitful, and such acts alone will fall within the purview of Section 420 IPC.

"The Trial Magistrate should have exercised prudence, making at least a cursory effort to discern the actual ‘victim’ or ‘victimiser’. The failure to do so is both fallible and atrocious," the bench said.

The court allowed a plea filed by Mariam Fasihuddin and her father against the Karnataka High Court's order of February 18, 2021 with Rs one lakh cost on husband, after noting the trial magistrate and the High Court unfortunately failed to appreciate that the genesis of the present controversy lies in a marital dispute.

In the case, the bench, however, said the elementary ingredients of ‘cheating’ and ‘forgery’ are conspicuously missing in the case, so the continuation of the criminal proceedings before a Bengaluru court against the appellants is nothing but an abuse of the process of law.

"This court, therefore, will exercise caution before invoking such severe offences and penalties solely on the basis of conjectures and surmises," the bench said.

The court noted the conduct of complainant husband in the case infringed upon the right of the minor child to travel and seek care and company of the father.

It also noted "glaring procedural irregularities", overlooked by the Trial Magistrate, and other "improprieties" as the supplementary chargesheet filed by the investigating authority included the offence of ‘forgery’ under Sections 468 and 471 IPC, on a forensic report obtained by the husband through a private lab.

"A paid report obtained from a private laboratory seems to be a frail, unreliable, unsafe, untrustworthy and imprudent form of evidence, unless supported by some other corroborative proof. It  is painful to mention that husband has not produced any other substantive proof, nor has the investigating agency obtained any such material for further investigation. The basis on which the Trial Magistrate formed a prima facie opinion is beyond our comprehension," the bench said.

The court also said the timeline is noteworthy since immediately after the appellant wife filed an FIR against the husband on April 8, 2010, invoking Sections 346, 498A, 506, and 34 IPC, the counter complaint by the husband followed on May 13, 2010.

The marriage between the parties was solemnised in 2007. It was alleged the husband who was engaged in Software business in London. After a lot of persuasion, he agreed to take wife to London. However, soon after, he confined her to the residence of her sister-in-law. She, somehow, managed to return to India. Husband during his visit in 2009 threatened the wife, and took away the minor child's passport to arrange the travel.

Though passport was issued sometime in 2009 and the question was whether it is a mere coincidence that the husband chose to make his complaint only after an FIR had been lodged against him, the court asked.

Instead of complying with the law which imposes an obligation upon the husband to provide adequate maintenance to his wife and the minor child, the complaint lodged by the husband on May 13, 2010, while unleashing accusations of forgery and fabrication, is conveniently silent on what measures he has undertaken for his minor child’s welfare, the bench said.

The court referred to Section 12(b) of the Passports Act, 1967, saying the cognisance of such like offence can be taken only at the instance of the Prescribed Authority and no complaint to that effect has been disclosed against the appellants.

"The appellants were unnecessarily implicated and dragged into criminal proceedings, thereby causing undue hardship to them," the bench concluded.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER] Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER]

without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage of investigation and the period of detention he faced in jail, the Court after analyzing all things allowed bail to the accused person ( Jai Ram). Himachal Pradesh High Court, Grant Bail, Justice Anup Chitrakara

How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.? How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.?

SHO Bhardwaj was quick to defend the Maulvi in questioning regarding the Mazar but harassed the reported who sought truth. Why did the SHO have to harass a Media reporter when he was doing his job? Who benefits from this? Why is there a Mazar on a flyover? Why is a Minority Welfare development Board in control of so much property? || #Mazar #SHOBhardwaj #Mazar #Mosque #WaqfBoard #Islam #News #Waqf #RemoveSHOBharadwaj

Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today? Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today?

Towards the end of the clip, Advocate Jain can be seen questioning the leaders of our land, the Central Government, and the parliament to look into the above and review such biased provisions for the greater good of all.  In the end, we are made to question if India is a secular country in the true sense of the term, after all! Wakf board land scam, Central Waqf Board, secular India article

TRENDING NEWS

fundamental-right-to-health-includes-consumers-right-to-be-made-aware-of-quality-of-products-sc
Trending Judiciary
Fundamental right to health includes consumers' right to be made aware of quality of products: SC [Read Order]

Right to health includes consumers' right to know product quality. Advertisers must submit self-declarations for ads to ensure transparency and accountability: SC

17 May, 2024 01:43 PM
sc-asks-ed-to-file-response-to-sorens-plea-for-interim-on-may-20
Trending Judiciary
SC asks ED to file response to Soren's plea for interim on May 20

SC asks ED to file a response by May 20 to Hemant Soren's plea for interim bail during Lok Sabha elections, with a hearing scheduled for May 21.

17 May, 2024 06:12 PM

TOP STORIES

indian-courts-this-week-law-street-journals-weekly-round-up-of-sc-hcs-may-6-may-10
Trending Judiciary
Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [May 6 - May 10]

Get the latest updates from India's Supreme Court and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

13 May, 2024 10:29 AM
sc-dismisses-union-govt-plea-against-bail-to-maoist-financer-in-case-of-attack-on-police-party-in-jharkhand
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Union govt's plea against bail to Maoist financer in case of attack on police party in Jharkhand [Read Judgment]

SC rejects govt's plea against bail for accused in Jharkhand police attack case, citing absence of violated bail conditions.

13 May, 2024 11:33 AM
supreme-court-upholds-gang-rape-conviction-though-victim-turned-hostile
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court upholds gang rape conviction, though victim turned hostile [Read Judgment]

SC upholds gang rape conviction despite victim's hostility, affirming witness credibility in criminal trials.

13 May, 2024 12:24 PM
sanatana-dharma-remarks-sc-seeks-response-from-up-maha-ktka-bihar-jamp;k-on-udhayanidhis-plea-for-clubbing-firs
Trending Judiciary
Sanatana Dharma remarks SC seeks response from UP, Maha, Ktka, Bihar, J&K on Udhayanidhi's plea for clubbing FIRs

SC seeks response on Udhayanidhi's plea for clubbing FIRs related to his remarks on 'Sanatan Dharma'.

13 May, 2024 12:39 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email