38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, May 20, 2024
Judiciary

Children from void, voidable marriage can claim right to parents' ancestral property in Hindu joint family: SC [Read Judgment]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      02 September, 2023 02:54 PM      0 Comments
Children from void, voidable marriage can claim right to parents' ancestral property in Hindu joint family: SC [Read Judgment]

NEW DELHI: In significant judgement, the Supreme Court Friday ruled that children born out of void or voidable marriages can claim rights on their parents' ancestral property in joint Hindu families following the Mitakshara system of law.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said that a child under Section 16(1) and Section 16(2) of Hindu Marriage Act (HMA) would be legitimate kin under the Hindu Succession Act (HSA).

"The provisions of the HSA 1956 have to be harmonized with the mandate in Section 16(3) of the HMA 1955 which indicates that a child who is conferred with legitimacy under sub-sections (1) and (2) will not be entitled to rights in or to the property of any person other than the parents. The property of the parent, where the parent had an interest in the property of a Joint Hindu family governed under the Mitakshara law has to be ascertained in terms of the Explanation to sub-section (3)," the bench said.

The judgement was passed on a reference made in 2011 plea pertaining to the legal issue of whether non-marital children were entitled to a share in the ancestral property of their parents under Hindu laws.

The bench confirmed legitimacy in terms of subsection 1 on a child born from a void marriage and under subsection 2 to a child born from a voidable marriage, which has been annulled.

The bench said the legislature has stipulated in subsection 3 of Section 16 that such a child will have rights in the property of parents and not in the property of any other person.

“While construing the provisions of Section 3 (1) (j) of HSA, 1956, including the proviso, the legitimacy which has been conferred by Section 16 of HMA, on a child born from a void or as the case may voidable marriage has to be read into the provisions of HSA, 1956. In other words, child is legitimate under subsection 1, subsection 2 of Section 16 of HMA would for purpose of section 3 (1) (j) of HSA, fall within the ambit of the explanation related by legitimate…..and cannot be regarded as illegitimate child for the purpose of inheritance to ancestral property ,” the bench said.

The bench clarified that the reference to the three Judge Bench in this batch of cases is confined to Joint Hindu families governed by Mitakshara law. This Court has, therefore, dwelt on the interpretation of the provisions of the HSA 1956 in relation to Joint Hindu families of that class.

The top court was told that Section 16 of the HMA intended to protect and provide legal status to children born from void or voidable marriages and that intention of the Parliament has been expressly declared pursuant to the 1976 Amendment to the HMA and a limited category of persons has been sought to be conferred a legal status, i.e. children born from void or voidable marriages.

The top court was asked to declare children born from void or voidable marriages as provided in Section 11 and 12 of the HMA as coparceners, who would be entitled to a share in ancestral property as per rules of devolution.

In its judgement, the bench noted that Parliament has stepped in to provide rights to daughters by recognising their position as coparceners so as to have rights in  coparcenary property on an equal footing with sons. The amendments that have  been made by Parliament have redefined the ambit of the coparcenary in a Hindu Undivided Family governed by Mitakshara law by specifically conferring rights upon daughters.

"Section 6(1) which confers a right on the daughter of a coparcener to become a coparcener by birth in her own right and in the same manner as the son and to have the same rights in the coparcenary property provides abundant statutory material to indicate that the legislature did not abolish the basic concepts of a HUF, coparcenary, and coparcenary property. The legislature brought about a significant reform by recognising the rights of daughters to become coparceners at par with sons. Prior to the amendment, a son would become a coparcener by birth but after the amendment, the right of a daughter to become a coparcener by birth has been recognised," the bench said.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER] Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER]

without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage of investigation and the period of detention he faced in jail, the Court after analyzing all things allowed bail to the accused person ( Jai Ram). Himachal Pradesh High Court, Grant Bail, Justice Anup Chitrakara

How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.? How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.?

SHO Bhardwaj was quick to defend the Maulvi in questioning regarding the Mazar but harassed the reported who sought truth. Why did the SHO have to harass a Media reporter when he was doing his job? Who benefits from this? Why is there a Mazar on a flyover? Why is a Minority Welfare development Board in control of so much property? || #Mazar #SHOBhardwaj #Mazar #Mosque #WaqfBoard #Islam #News #Waqf #RemoveSHOBharadwaj

Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today? Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today?

Towards the end of the clip, Advocate Jain can be seen questioning the leaders of our land, the Central Government, and the parliament to look into the above and review such biased provisions for the greater good of all.  In the end, we are made to question if India is a secular country in the true sense of the term, after all! Wakf board land scam, Central Waqf Board, secular India article

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-issues-notice-to-ed-on-hemant-sorens-plea-against-arrest-in-land-scam
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice to ED on Hemant Soren's Plea Against Arrest in Land Scam

Supreme Court issues notice to ED on Hemant Soren's plea against arrest in a land scam case, sets hearing for May 17 after senior advocate Kapil Sibal's request for an earlier date.

14 May, 2024 11:24 AM
3800-metric-tonnes-of-solid-wastes-going-untreated-everyday-in-delhi-sc-records-concern
Trending Environment
3,800 metric tonnes of solid wastes going untreated everyday in Delhi SC records concern

The Supreme Court expressed concern as 3,800 metric tonnes of solid waste in Delhi go untreated daily. The issue must be addressed promptly beyond political lines.

14 May, 2024 11:30 AM
plea-filed-in-sc-for-review-of-april-26-evm-vvpat-verdict
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for review of April 26 EVM VVPAT verdict

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court to review its April 26 verdict on EVM VVPAT verification, challenging the decision that dismissed a demand for 100% vote cross-verification.

14 May, 2024 12:13 PM
ai-cant-detect-consent-microsoft-and-google-tell-delhi-high-court
Trending Judiciary
AI can’t detect consent Microsoft and Google tell Delhi High Court

Microsoft and Google tell Delhi HC that AI can't detect consent for NCII takedowns, challenging a 24-hour removal directive under IT Act's safe harbour protections.

14 May, 2024 01:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email