38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, June 23, 2024
Judiciary

Arbitration Agreements Can Be Bound on Non Signataries Under Group of Companies Doctrine in India [Read Judgment]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      07 December, 2023 02:23 PM      0 Comments
Arbitration Agreements Can Be Bound on Non Signataries Under Group of Companies Doctrine in India

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday held that an arbitration agreement can be binding on non-signatory firms under the 'group of companies' doctrine, which should be read into the Indian arbitration statutes and rules.

"The group of companies doctrine should be retained in the Indian arbitration jurisprudence considering its utility in determining the intention of the parties in the context of complex transactions involving multiple parties and multiple agreements," a five-judge Constitution bench presided over by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud said.

In its 152-page judgment, the bench explained the definition of “parties” under Section 2(1)(h) read with Section 7 of the Arbitration Act includes both the signatory as well as non-signatory parties.

“Conduct of the non-signatory parties could be an indicator of their consent to be bound by the arbitration agreement. The requirement of a written arbitration agreement under Section 7 does not exclude the possibility of binding non-signatory parties,” it said.

The bench said to apply the group of companies doctrine, the courts or tribunals, as the case may be, have to consider all the cumulative factors laid down in Discovery Enterprises case.

“The group of companies doctrine has an independent existence as a principle of law which stems from a harmonious reading of Section 2(1)(h) along with Section 7 of the Arbitration Act," the bench said.

The bench also declared that since consent forms the cornerstone of arbitration, a non-signatory cannot be forcibly made a “party” to an arbitration agreement as doing so would violate the sacrosanct principles of privity of contract and party autonomy. However, in case of multiparty contracts, the courts and tribunals are often called upon to determine the parties to an arbitration agreement, it added.

The bench said, “The underlying basis for the application of the group of companies doctrine rests on maintaining the corporate separateness of the group companies while determining the common intention of the parties to bind the non-signatory party to the arbitration agreement”.

The bench said the requirement of a written arbitration agreement does not exclude the possibility of binding non-signatory parties if there is a defined legal relationship between the signatory and non-signatory parties.

The bench, also comprising Justices Hrishikesh Roy, P S Narasimha, J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, delivered its judgment on a plea filed by Cox and Kings Ltd in a dispute arising out of an arbitration agreement. A reference was made to the Constitution bench in May, 2022 by a three-judge bench to determine the validity of the ‘group of companies’ doctrine in the jurisprudence of Indian arbitration.

In his separate and concurring judgment, Justice Narasimha said an agreement to refer disputes to arbitration must be in a written form, as against an oral agreement, but need not be signed by the parties.

He wrote under Section 7(4)(b), a court or arbitral tribunal will determine whether a non-signatory is a party to an arbitration agreement by interpreting the express language employed by the parties in the record of agreement, coupled with surrounding circumstances of the formation, performance, and discharge of the contract.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

The Orissa High Court has been without a permanent chief justice since January 5, 2020 after the retirement of former Chief Justice, KS Jhaveri. The high court is currently headed by acting Chief Justice Sanju Panda.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER] Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER]

without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage of investigation and the period of detention he faced in jail, the Court after analyzing all things allowed bail to the accused person ( Jai Ram). Himachal Pradesh High Court, Grant Bail, Justice Anup Chitrakara

How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.? How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.?

SHO Bhardwaj was quick to defend the Maulvi in questioning regarding the Mazar but harassed the reported who sought truth. Why did the SHO have to harass a Media reporter when he was doing his job? Who benefits from this? Why is there a Mazar on a flyover? Why is a Minority Welfare development Board in control of so much property? || #Mazar #SHOBhardwaj #Mazar #Mosque #WaqfBoard #Islam #News #Waqf #RemoveSHOBharadwaj

TRENDING NEWS

new-anti-cheating-law-enacted-analysis
Trending Executive
New Anti-Cheating Law enacted: Analysis

In-depth analysis of India’s new Anti-Cheating Law, the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, aimed at curbing exam malpractices.

22 June, 2024 11:38 AM
calcutta-hc-closes-suit-between-dabur-india-and-youtuber-dhruv-rathee-for-trademark-infringement-of-real-fruit-juice
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC closes suit between Dabur India and YouTuber Dhruv Rathee for trademark infringement of Real fruit juice [Read Order]

A year after Calcutta High Court said that Youtuber Dhruv Rathee crossed the 'Lakshman Rekha', Rathee's proposal to withdraw 'Real' juice trademark from video gets accepted by Dabur.

22 June, 2024 02:47 PM

TOP STORIES

women-including-housewife-approach-ncw-against-controversial-ips-officer-gyaneshwar-singh
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Women, including housewife, approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh

Two women approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh, citing harassment for tweets based on news reports about his involvement in high-profile cases.

17 June, 2024 03:10 PM
courts-this-week-law-street-journal-s-weekly-round-up-of-sc-anf-hcs-june-10-june-15
Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [June 10 - June 15]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

17 June, 2024 03:29 PM
man-sues-apple-for-5-million-blaming-company-for-divorce-after-wife-discovers-deleted-messages-with-sex-workers
Trending Business
Man sues Apple for £5 million, blaming company for divorce after wife discovers ‘deleted messages’ with sex workers

A UK man sues Apple for £5M, claiming their unclear policy on deleted messages led to his divorce after his wife found texts to sex workers on another device.

17 June, 2024 04:26 PM
ex-karnataka-cm-yediyurappa-appears-before-cid-for-pocso-case-probe-with-protection-of-no-arrest
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, with protection of 'no arrest'

Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, denies allegations, granted ‘no arrest’ protection. Next hearing: June 28.

17 June, 2024 04:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email