38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Judiciary

Amicus curiae supports plea for permanent disqualification of convicted lawmakers [Read Report]

By LawStreet News Network      15 September, 2023 06:41 PM      0 Comments
Amicus curiae supports plea for permanent disqualification of convicted lawmakers [Read Report]

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has been told that the legal provisions which limited the disqualification for six years after the release of the convict from jail are manifestly arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. 

"Parliamentarians and the Legislators represent the sovereign will of the people and once found to have committed an offence involving moral turpitude, are liable to be permanently disqualified from holding the said office. Limiting the period of disqualification is a flagrant violation of the equality clause enriched in Article 14 of the Constitution," senior advocate Vijay Hansaria said.

Acting as amicus curiae, he, along with advocate Sneha Kalita filed the 19 th report filed in a PIL by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay related to expeditious trial of MP and MLAs.

He favoured permanent disqualification of convicted lawmakers from holding the office.

The counsel suggested the court to examine the matter related to permanent disqualification independently.

The counsel stated provisions of sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) of section 8 of the Representation of People Act to the extent they provide that “shall continue to be disqualified for a further period of six years since his release” is manifestly arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

"There is no nexus for limiting the disqualification for a period of six years since the release of the convict with the object of disqualifying him from becoming a member of the legislature," he said.

The counsel pointed out as per the existing provisions, a person is eligible to contest election after six years of the release even if convicted for heinous offences like rape or for dealing with drugs or being involved in terrorist activities or having indulged in corruption.

He said there are many statutory authorities who are permanently disqualified from holding the posts upon conviction.

"But the person making the law would incur the disqualification only for a limited period, though the lawmakers are required to be much more sacrosanct and inviolable than the persons holding office under such law," he said.

Citing Service Rules applicable to the central and state government employees, a person convicted for any offence involving moral turpitude is liable to be dismissed from the service, he said.

"Even a Class-IV employee would be terminated from service, once convicted for an offence involving moral turpitude, not to speak of Class-I, II and III employees and the persons holding any offices under the All India Services Act, 1951 and the Rules framed thereunder," he said.

The counsel also cited expert bodies and committees which have raised concerns about the criminalisation of politics from time to time:-

* Dinesh Goswami Committee Report (1990)

* Vohra Committee Report (1993)

* Indrajit Gupta Committee on State Funding of Elections (1998)

* Law Commission 170th Report on Reforms of the Electoral Laws (1999)

* National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (2001)

* Election Commission of India — Proposed Electoral Reforms (2004)

* Parliamentary Standing Committee 18th Report (2007)

* The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2008)
ix. Justice J.S. Verma Committee Report on Amendments to Criminal Law (2013)

* Law Commission of India - 239th Report on on expeditious investigation and trial of criminal cases against influential public personalities (2012) and

* Law Commission of India - 244th Report on electoral disqualification
(2014).

He also said the Supreme Court in various judgments has also noted the increasing trend of criminalisation of politics which has severely affected the democratic functioning.

[Read Report] 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER] Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER]

without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage of investigation and the period of detention he faced in jail, the Court after analyzing all things allowed bail to the accused person ( Jai Ram). Himachal Pradesh High Court, Grant Bail, Justice Anup Chitrakara

How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.? How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.?

SHO Bhardwaj was quick to defend the Maulvi in questioning regarding the Mazar but harassed the reported who sought truth. Why did the SHO have to harass a Media reporter when he was doing his job? Who benefits from this? Why is there a Mazar on a flyover? Why is a Minority Welfare development Board in control of so much property? || #Mazar #SHOBhardwaj #Mazar #Mosque #WaqfBoard #Islam #News #Waqf #RemoveSHOBharadwaj

Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today? Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today?

Towards the end of the clip, Advocate Jain can be seen questioning the leaders of our land, the Central Government, and the parliament to look into the above and review such biased provisions for the greater good of all.  In the end, we are made to question if India is a secular country in the true sense of the term, after all! Wakf board land scam, Central Waqf Board, secular India article

TRENDING NEWS

need-to-safeguard-judiciary-from-unwarranted-pressures-21-ex-judges-write-letter-to-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
Need to safeguard judiciary from unwarranted pressures: 21 ex-judges write letter to CJI

21 ex-judges write to CJI Chandrachud urging protection of judiciary from pressures undermining its integrity and autonomy.

15 April, 2024 12:17 PM
sc-notice-to-ed-declines-early-date-on-plea-by-delhi-cm-arvind-kejriwal-against-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED; declines early date on plea by Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal against arrest

SC issues notice to ED, declines early hearing on Delhi CM Kejriwal's plea against arrest in liquor scam.

15 April, 2024 03:08 PM

TOP STORIES

misleading-advts-case-baba-ramdev-balkrishna-tender-apology
Trending Business
Misleading advts case: Baba Ramdev, Balkrishna tender apology

Baba Ramdev, Balkrishna apologize for misleading ads. SC contempt plea hearing set for April 10. Patanjali assures compliance with court orders.

10 April, 2024 10:44 AM
sc-allows-gangster-turned-politicians-son-to-attend-fatiha
Trending Judiciary
SC allows gangster-turned-politician's son to attend 'Fatiha'

Supreme Court allows jailed MLA Abbas Ansari to attend his father's funeral prayers, granting temporary release under police custody.

10 April, 2024 11:11 AM
each-moveable-property-not-required-to-be-disclosed-by-candidates-in-election-sc
Trending Judiciary
Each moveable property not required to be disclosed by candidates in election: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules not every movable asset needs disclosure in elections. Privacy rights preserved. Details vary per case. High value assets matter.

10 April, 2024 12:02 PM
delhi-cm-arvind-kejriwal-moves-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal moves Supreme Court

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal moves Supreme Court against dismissal of plea in liquor policy scam case. Lawyers seek early hearing from CJI-led bench.

10 April, 2024 12:39 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email