38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 24, 2024
Judiciary

Allahabad High Court Transfers Krishna Janmabhoomi Cases to Itself for Trial [Transfer Application]

By Harshvardhan Sharma      27 May, 2023 06:42 PM      0 Comments
Allahabad High Court Transfers Krishna Janmabhoomi Cases to Itself for Trial

In a major development, the Allahabad High Court on Friday ordered for transfer of all the cases related to Krishna Janmabhoomi pending before the Mathura court to itself, while exercising its suo motu power for trial.

A single bench of Justice Arvind Kumar Mishra also allowed a transfer petition filed by Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman and seven others through advocates Hari Shankar Jain, Vishnu Shankar Jain, Prabhash Pandey and others.

"As many as 10 suits are stated to be pending before the civil court and also there should be more suits that can be said to be pending and issue can be said to be seminal public importance affected the masses beyond tribe and beyond communities having not proceeded an inch further since their institution on merits for past two to three years, provides full justification for withdrawal of all the suits touching upon the issue involved in the suit from the civil court concerned to this court under Section 24(1)(b) Civil Procedure Code.

While allowing the plea for transfer of one suit, the court exercised its suo motu power for the rest of the suits of similar nature, by withdrawing it from the lower civil court concerned and transferred those to the High Court.

The court ordered the District Judge, Mathura to prepare a list of all such cases of similar nature involving the subject matter and forward it to the High Court for transfer within two weeks.

It also requested the Chief Justice to nominate an appropriate bench for trial and disposal of such suits.

The plea was originally filed in the lower court -- the court of civil judge senior division -- on September 25, 2020 by Lucknow-resident Ranjana Agnihotri, and others as the "next friend of Bhagwan Sri Krishna Virajman".

They had claimed in the plea that Shahi Idgah Masjid is constructed on a part of 13.37 acre land belonging to the Sri Krishna Janam Bhoomi Trust. They had demanded the mosque be removed and the land returned to the Trust.

They also contended that the Shahi Idgah Mosque had been built by Mughal emperor Aurangzeb after demolishing a part of the Shri Krishna Janam Bhoomi.

They have also challenged the 1968 agreement between the Shahi Idgah Mosque Committee and the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust allowing the Mosque to continue to exist and use the land on which it was situated.

They also claimed entire birth place of Lord Krishna and sought removal of encroachment of superstructure built as Shahi Idgah masjid over there.

During the hearing, U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board and Trust Shahi Masjid Eidgah opposed the plea for transfer of suits.

It is to be noted that suits related to Ram Janam Bhoomi at Ayodhya was also transferred for trial before the High Court vide on July 10, 1989, which was decided on September 30, 2010. Subsequently, the Supreme Court on November 9, 2019 decided the matter in favour of Hindu side.

In the instant case, the court noted  that the history of 'Karagar' (jail) of Kans wherein Lord Krishna incarnated in human form, is sacred and divine for the Hindu devotees. It is a deity worshiped by the Hindu devotees. The 'Karagar' of 'Kans' at present is located beneath the alleged Shahi Eidgah Masjid. It also said various complicated questions are involved here and called for adjudication, including interpretation, validity and applicability of Places of Worship Act 1991, interpretation and applicability of Waqf Act 1995, rights of Hindu deity under Hindu Law and under Article 25 of the Constitution and interpretation of Article 25, 26 and 300 A of the Constitution India.

"Moreover, it involves adjudication on point of birth place –'Asthan', as deity, the rights and duty of Shebait under Hindu Law and rights of Hindu devotees where Shebait has been negligent and the property of the deity has been alienated/transferred against the law, decree obtained by fraud and challenged by Hindu devotees, adjudication upon distinction between Waqf and Trust, and apart from all above point of applicability and interpretation of law of adverse possession," it said.

The Muslim side, for their part, said if transfer appellation is allowed, it would be opening pandora box and would lead to similar move in every case pertaining to religious places. They also contended that in the matter of Kashi Vishwanath Temple dispute, the Supreme Court on May 20, 2022 transferred the proceeding of the original suit to the District Judge, Varanasi.

They also said it would cause inconvenience to witnesses to travel to Prayagraj for recording evidence.

Dealing with their contentions, the High Court said there is no bar in the law that the HC cannot try suit if it is withdrawn from civil court or transferred to it.

With regard to their argument of losing their right of filing theappeal before the High Court, the bench said  all procedures are merely handmade of the justice, the ultimate aim is to provide speedy
justice.

The court also rejected their plea that Ram Janam Bhoomi case was transferred as the suit could not be decided in 40 years.

"The facts disclose that it was on account of religious sentiments, general of tensions between two communities and to preserve amity brotherly relations, the application was moved and not on account of fact that the matter was not decided for 40 years," the bench said.

So far as the inconvenience to witnesses was concerned, the bench said, the Order 18 Rule 4 CPC provides for recording evidence and it is for the court to record evidence either itself or by commissioner appointed by it.

"With the advancement of the technology and impetus being provided to e-judiciary, physical presence of the witnesses can be done in the manner and mode as per discretion available with this Court trying the suit and it can be recorded through audio – video link," the bench said.

Transfer Application



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Allahabad High Court Transfers Krishna Janmabhoomi Cases to Itself for Trial [Transfer Application] Allahabad High Court Transfers Krishna Janmabhoomi Cases to Itself for Trial [Transfer Application]

The Allahabad High Court has ordered the transfer of all cases related to Krishna Janmabhoomi from the Mathura court to itself. The court exercised its suo motu power for trial and allowed a transfer petition filed by Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman and others. The cases involve the claim that Shahi Idgah Masjid was constructed on land belonging to the Sri Krishna Janam Bhoomi Trust and demand its removal. The court directed the District Judge, Mathura to prepare a list of similar cases for transfer. The decision raises complex questions related to the interpretation of laws and the rights of Hindu deities and devotees.

Allahabad High Court Raps Censor Board Over Dialogues and Scenes in 'Adipurush Allahabad High Court Raps Censor Board Over Dialogues and Scenes in 'Adipurush

The Allahabad High Court criticizes the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for approving the film 'Adipurush' despite objectionable dialogues and scenes from the Hindu epic 'Ramayana'. The court questions the board's understanding of its responsibilities and considers banning the movie. Social activists have filed PILs, claiming that the film has hurt religious sentiments. The court also allows a co-writer to be a party in the matter. This is not the first time such controversy has arisen in Bollywood films.

Supreme Court: No Lesser Sentence Under POCSO Act for Aggravated Sexual Assault on Children [Read Judgment] Supreme Court: No Lesser Sentence Under POCSO Act for Aggravated Sexual Assault on Children [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that courts cannot impose a lesser sentence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The decision came in response to a case where the Allahabad High Court reduced the sentence of a man convicted of aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child. The Supreme Court emphasized the lifelong impact on the victim and upheld the importance of stringent punishment for such crimes.

'Adipurush' Makers File Plea in Supreme Court Against High Court Order on Personal Appearance 'Adipurush' Makers File Plea in Supreme Court Against High Court Order on Personal Appearance

The makers of 'Adipurush' have filed a plea in the Supreme Court against the High Court's order on their personal appearance regarding objectionable content. Two PILs were filed alleging the movie's depiction of religious gods and characters, hurting public sentiments.

TRENDING NEWS

no-legal-mandate-for-uploading-of-form-17c-on-website-or-handing-over-to-anyone-other-than-candidate-or-agent-ec-tells-sc
Trending Judiciary
No legal mandate for uploading of Form 17C on website or handing over to anyone other than candidate or agent, EC tells SC

EC tells SC there's no legal mandate to upload Form 17C on websites or provide it to anyone other than candidates or agents, citing risks of misuse and mistrust.

23 May, 2024 11:28 AM
national-security-always-paramount-sc-cancels-bail-of-pfi-members
Trending Judiciary
'National security always paramount,' SC cancels bail of PFI members [Read Judgment]

SC emphasizes national security, cancels bail of eight PFI members, stressing balance between civil liberties and counter-terrorism under UAPA.

23 May, 2024 12:05 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-notice-to-ec-on-plea-by-adr-for-release-of-voters-turnout-data
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to EC on plea by ADR for release of voters turnout data

SC issues notice to EC on ADR plea to release voter turnout data. SC demands EC to disclose vote counts within 48 hours after each phase of the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.

18 May, 2024 11:16 AM
recovered-direct-chats-between-kejriwal-and-hawala-operators-on-transfer-of-money-ed-claims-before-sc
Trending Judiciary
Recovered direct chats between Kejriwal and hawala operators on transfer of money, ED claims before SC

ED claims to have recovered direct chats between Kejriwal and hawala operators on money transfer in Delhi liquor policy scam; SC reserves judgement on arrest appeal.

18 May, 2024 11:47 AM
delhi-hc-refuses-jackie-shroff-interim-relief-against-youtuber-unfilteredthugesh-for-alleged-personality-rights-infringement
Trending CelebStreet
Delhi HC refuses Jackie Shroff interim relief against Youtuber 'UnfilteredThugesh' for using "Thug Life" in video on Shroff

The Delhi High Court has refused Jackie Shroff interim relief against Youtuber 'UnfilteredThugesh' for alleged personality rights' infringement.

18 May, 2024 05:20 PM
abuse-under-sc-st-act-has-to-be-in-public-view-to-make-out-offence-sc
Trending Judiciary
Abuse under SC/ST Act has to be in public view to make out offence: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules abuse under SC/ST Act must be in public view. Case involves Olympic Riding and Equestrian Academy, highlighting key requirements for the offence.

18 May, 2024 05:45 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email